Mietwagen (Rental Car) After the Accident: What the Insurer Must Pay and Where It May Cut Costs
You are entitled to reimbursement of the necessary rental car costs for the period your vehicle is out of service, though an expensive Unfallersatztarif (accident replacement tariff) is only reimbursable under specific conditions.
The Unfallersatztarif (accident replacement tariff) is a price higher than the Normaltarif (standard market tariff) that rental companies charge to price in the particular risk of an accident rental — advance performance, uncertain payment by the opposing insurer, and extra administrative effort. Whether it is reimbursable in full depends on whether a cheaper Normaltarif was accessible to you and whether a genuine Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation) existed. The benchmark for comparison is lists such as Schwacke or Fraunhofer, not the vehicle's engine power.
Can I Get a Rental Car Through My Kaskoversicherung Too?
If you have Kaskoversicherung (comprehensive vehicle insurance): A rental car is generally not covered under Kaskoversicherung. It is reimbursable there only if you agreed a separate rental car add-on — regardless of how the opposing party's Haftpflichtversicherung (third-party liability insurance) settles the claim.
Do I Have to Accept the Repair Shop or Partner Rental Car Named by the Insurer?
In settling the claim, you are „Herr des Restitutionsgeschehens" (literally "master of the restitution process") — the Dispositionsfreiheit (your freedom to decide how the damage is remedied) under § 249 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB lies with you, not the insurer (BGH, judgment of 29.01.2019, VI ZR 481/17). A mere general information letter naming no specific vehicle does not bind you.
In fairness: The Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) limits the claim to the Unfallersatztarif once there is no longer a genuine Not- und Eilsituation — as a rule, renting only on the day after the accident is no longer enough on its own. Whether such a situation existed in your case depends on the specific circumstances of the rental.
Also known as
- Unfallersatztarif
- insurance cut my rental car bill after an accident
- insurer only paid the standard car rental rate not the accident rate
- accident replacement tariff Germany insurance dispute
- German insurer rental car reimbursement refused
- rental car cost deduction after car accident Germany
The numbers
| Value | Meaning | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Prozent | Flat surcharge on the Normaltarif (standard tariff) that the BGH confirmed as appropriate in a genuine Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation) | BGH VI ZR 245/11 | 05.03.2013 |
| ab rund 1,000 km | Mileage threshold above which courts regularly review an Eigenersparnisabzug (deduction for personal cost savings) when a rental car of at least equivalent quality was used | IWW Unfallregulierung effektiv 08/2026 | 2026 |
| 3 bis 15 Prozent | Typical range for an Eigenersparnisabzug from the base rate, varying by court | IWW Unfallregulierung effektiv 08/2026 | 2026 |
| 14 Tage | Adopted by a local court (Amtsgericht) in 2006 as the cut-off point beyond which there is no longer a duty to switch to a cheaper tariff — no uniform line since | AG Hof 14 C 1695/05 | 04.09.2006 |
Worked example
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Rental company invoice (Unfallersatztarif, 11 days) | 1,650.00 € |
| Market-standard Normaltarif for 11 days (Schwacke-Liste) | 1,210.00 € |
| Insurer's payment (Normaltarif only) | 1,210.00 € |
| Difference without proven emergency | 440.00 € |
| With proven Not- und Eilsituation: Normaltarif plus 20% surcharge | 1,452.00 € |
| Remaining, unenforceable difference to the Unfallersatztarif | 198.00 € |
Result: Without a proven emergency, the insurer pays only the Normaltarif. If you can prove a genuine Not- und Eilsituation, the reimbursable amount increases by the recognized 20 percent surcharge — the full Unfallersatztarif still often remains out of reach.
What the insurer typically writes
These are paraphrased summaries of typical settlement-letter reasoning, not verbatim quotes from one specific letter.
The bracketed English text is a translation aid only.
„Wir erstatten nur den Normaltarif nach der Schwacke-Liste, da eine besondere Eil- oder Notsituation nicht ersichtlich ist.“ (English: "We will only reimburse the standard tariff under the Schwacke list, since we see no special emergency situation.")
„Unser Partnerunternehmen bietet Ihnen ein klassengleiches Fahrzeug zu einem günstigeren Tagespreis an.“ (English: "Our partner company offers you a vehicle of the same class at a lower daily rate.")
„Der von Ihnen gewählte Unfallersatztarif war nicht erforderlich, da Ihnen ein Normaltarif zugänglich gewesen wäre.“ (English: "The accident replacement tariff you chose was not necessary, since a standard tariff would have been accessible to you.")
„Wir ziehen einen Eigenersparnisanteil ab, da Sie durch die Anmietung eigene Betriebskosten gespart haben.“ (English: "We are deducting a personal savings amount, since renting the car saved you your own operating costs.")
How you can respond
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
Sie haben die Mietwagenkosten in Höhe von … Euro auf den Normaltarif gekürzt. Die Anmietung erfolgte in einer Not- und Eilsituation, weil … (Unfallzeitpunkt außerhalb der Öffnungszeiten, dringender Termin oder fehlende Recherchemöglichkeit vor Ort schildern). Der Bundesgerichtshof erkennt in einer solchen Lage einen pauschalen Aufschlag von 20 Prozent auf den Normaltarif an (Urteil vom 05.03.2013, VI ZR 245/11). Für die Ausfallzeit war zudem kein günstigerer, mühelos zugänglicher Tarif verfügbar.
Ich bitte um Nachzahlung der Differenz bis zum …
English translation (for your understanding only — send the German text above, not this one):
Dear Sir or Madam,
You have reduced the rental car costs of … euros to the Normaltarif (standard tariff). The rental took place in a Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation) because … (describe the emergency here — e.g. accident occurred outside business hours, urgent appointment, no way to research options on site). The Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) recognizes a flat 20 percent surcharge on the Normaltarif in such a situation (judgment of 05.03.2013, VI ZR 245/11). No cheaper, easily accessible tariff was available for the period the vehicle was out of service.
I request payment of the difference by … .
Die Versicherung hat Ihnen einen eigenen Mietwagenanbieter genannt — so prüfen Sie das Schreiben
- Wird ein konkretes Fahrzeug und eine konkrete Fahrzeugklasse genannt, oder nur ein allgemeiner Tagespreis?
- Ist der genannte Preis brutto oder netto ausgewiesen? Nettopreis-Angaben ohne Hinweis gelten als irreführend, Sie müssen sie nicht selbst umrechnen.
- Erreicht Sie das Schreiben vor oder erst nach der Anmietung? Nachträgliche Preisvorgaben entfalten keine Bindungswirkung.
- Ist der Anbieter regional verfügbar und kurzfristig erreichbar, oder handelt es sich um ein bundesweit tätiges Unternehmen ohne Fahrzeug vor Ort?
- Entspricht das Vergleichsfahrzeug Klasse und Ausstattung Ihres beschädigten Fahrzeugs, einschließlich einer Vollkaskoabsicherung ohne Selbstbeteiligung?
Sie sind bei der Schadensregulierung „Herr des Restitutionsgeschehens“ — die Dispositionsfreiheit nach § 249 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB liegt bei Ihnen, nicht beim Versicherer (BGH, Urteil vom 29.01.2019, VI ZR 481/17). Ein bloßes allgemeines Informationsschreiben ohne konkretes Fahrzeug bindet Sie nicht.
English translation (for your understanding only — send the German text above, not this one):
The Insurer Named Its Own Rental Car Provider — How to Check the Letter
- Does it name a specific vehicle and a specific vehicle class, or only a general daily rate?
- Is the stated price shown as gross or net? Net-price figures given without a clear note are considered misleading — you do not have to convert them yourself.
- Does the letter reach you before or only after the rental? Price terms set after the fact have no binding effect.
- Is the provider regionally available and reachable at short notice, or is it a nationwide company with no vehicle on site?
- Does the comparison vehicle match the class and equipment of your damaged vehicle, including Vollkaskoabsicherung (comprehensive cover) with no deductible?
In settling the claim, you are „Herr des Restitutionsgeschehens" (master of the restitution process) — the Dispositionsfreiheit (your freedom to decide how the damage is remedied) under § 249 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB lies with you, not the insurer (BGH, judgment of 29.01.2019, VI ZR 481/17). A mere general information letter naming no specific vehicle does not bind you.
This reflects German law and German court practice.
Note: this is general guidance on wording, not legal advice for your individual case. Adapt the text to your own situation or seek advice from a lawyer for your specific matter.
What the insurer typically does next
- It pays the additional Normaltarif amount if you have plausibly explained the Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation).
- It names its own rental car partner with a lower daily rate.
- It applies an Eigenersparnisabzug (personal savings deduction) if you used a rental car of the same or a higher class.
- It sticks to the reduction to the Normaltarif if it does not recognize an emergency.
Where to find this in the appraisal: The number of reimbursable rental days is based on the period stated in the appraisal under „Reparaturdauer“ (repair duration) or „Wiederbeschaffungsdauer“ (replacement procurement period), plus time for assessing the damage. If the repair duration is not stated, request a supplementary statement.
On the deadline: The Haftpflichtversicherer (third-party liability insurer) is usually granted a review period of four to six weeks from submission of the complete documents. Set a concrete payment deadline. If the insurer does not respond, it falls into Verzug (default in payment) under § 286 BGB and owes default interest from that point on. Claims arising from a road traffic accident generally become time-barred after three years, counted to the end of the year (§ 195, § 199 BGB).
This reflects German law only.
Case law
| Court | Case number | Date | Key finding | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGH | VI ZR 67/25 | 19.05.2026 | The benchmark for necessity is the vehicle class actually rented, not a hypothetical budget; the Unfallersatztarif is reimbursable only for genuine accident-related extra services. | https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de |
| BGH | VI ZR 74/04 | 15.02.2005 | The cost of Vollkaskoabsicherung (comprehensive cover) without a deductible on the rental car is generally reimbursable, even if the claimant's own vehicle was not fully comprehensively insured. | https://verkehrslexikon.de/ |
| BGH | VI ZR 245/11 | 05.03.2013 | Flat 20 percent surcharge applies in a Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation); as a rule, the emergency-situation principles no longer apply if the rental only begins on the day after the accident. | https://www.openjur.de |
| LG Hagen | 1 S 18/20 | 19.06.2020 | Necessary cost of restoration in rental car cases; Schwacke and Fraunhofer as estimation bases; an immediate rental alone does not establish a Not- und Eilsituation. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Hagen&Datum=19.06.2020&Aktenzeichen=1+S+18%2F20 |
| LG Leipzig | 5 S 345/13 | 23.01.2014 | An evening accident in a rural area with no way to research options establishes an emergency; a price above the Schwacke rate is then reimbursable. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Leipzig&Datum=23.01.2014&Aktenzeichen=5+S+345%2F13 |
| LG Berlin | 41 S 160/13 | 10.07.2014 | An accident after business hours with a need for the vehicle the following morning establishes a Not- und Eilsituation. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Berlin&Datum=10.07.2014&Aktenzeichen=41+S+160%2F13 |
| AG Hohenstein-Ernstthal | 4 C 195/21 | 03.09.2021 | An elderly claimant with a specialist medical appointment may rent immediately without first comparing offers. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Hohenstein-Ernstthal&Datum=03.09.2021&Aktenzeichen=4+C+195%2F21 |
| AG Bonn | 111 C 152/12 | 29.11.2012 | Net-price figures in the insurer's comparison offers without a clear note are misleading; the claimant does not have to accept dubious offers. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Bonn&Datum=29.11.2012&Aktenzeichen=111+C+152%2F12 |
| AG Wolfratshausen | 5 C 348/25 | 13.05.2026 | If only one rental company had a suitable vehicle available, a cheaper tariff was not reasonably accessible; Schwacke/Fraunhofer then do not apply. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Wolfratshausen&Datum=13.05.2026&Aktenzeichen=5+C+348%2F25 |
| LG Nürnberg-Fürth | 8 S 1002/07 | 23.05.2007 | Even with a justifiably expensive emergency rental, there is a duty to switch to a cheaper tariff as soon as reasonably possible. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+N%C3%BCrnberg-F%C3%BCrth&Datum=23.05.2007&Aktenzeichen=8+S+1002%2F07 |
| AG Hof | 14 C 1695/05 | 04.09.2006 | Opposing position, outdated. For a rental period of no more than 14 days, there is no duty to switch to a cheaper tariff. No settled line since. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Hof&Datum=04.09.2006&Aktenzeichen=14+C+1695%2F05 |
| BGH | VI ZR 481/17 | 29.01.2019 | Dispositionsfreiheit (the claimant's freedom to decide) under § 249 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB — the basis for the claimant deciding for themselves how the damage is remedied. | https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de |
| BGH | VI ZR 143/11 | 31.01.2012 | Assigning rental car claims to the rental company for collection is permitted without a licence under § 5 RDG, as long as only the amount of the claim is disputed, not liability as such. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=31.01.2012&Aktenzeichen=VI+ZR+143%2F11 |
| BGH | VI ZR 139/08 | 02.02.2010 | The party at fault bears the burden of showing and proving that a cheaper tariff than the Unfallersatztarif was readily accessible to the claimant. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=02.02.2010&Aktenzeichen=VI+ZR+139%2F08 |
| BGH | VI ZR 7/09 | 02.02.2010 | Estimating rental car costs under § 287 ZPO on the basis of the Schwacke list is permissible; a flat surcharge of around 20 percent for accident-related extra services may apply if the claimant does not set out concrete individual factors. | https://dejure.org/2010,51 |
| BGH | VI ZR 126/05 | 14.02.2006 | The Unfallersatztarif is only reimbursable to the extent the surcharge over the Normaltarif is economically justified. | https://dejure.org/2006,77 |
| BGH | VI ZR 151/03 | 12.10.2004 | Early leading decision distinguishing the Normaltarif from the Unfallersatztarif: the claimant does not breach the Schadensminderungspflicht (duty to mitigate damage) merely by renting at the Unfallersatztarif. | https://dejure.org/2004,22 |
| BGH | XII ZR 117/07 | 25.03.2009 | The provider of an accident replacement car must inform the renter of the risk that the other side's liability insurer will not reimburse a tariff above the Normaltarif in full; the scope of this duty to inform depends on the customer's business experience. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=25.03.2009&Aktenzeichen=XII+ZR+117%2F07 |
| OLG Celle | 14 U 19/23 | 13.09.2023 | Disproportionately high rental car costs run up against the obligation, where the vehicle is foreseeably out of service for a long period, to acquire a cheaper interim vehicle instead of renting expensively on an ongoing basis. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=OLG+Celle&Datum=13.09.2023&Aktenzeichen=14+U+19%2F23 |
| OLG Naumburg | 3 U 37/18 | 08.11.2018 | The 2016 Schwacke car rental price index is confirmed as an estimation basis; the deduction for saved personal expenses is 3 to 5 percent, not the 10 percent often applied. Towing, cleaning and test-drive costs were also awarded. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=OLG+Naumburg&Datum=08.11.2018&Aktenzeichen=3+U+37%2F18 |
| OLG Naumburg | 7 U 28/21 | 22.10.2021 | Higher rental car costs due to an extended rental period are reimbursable if the insurer wrongly objects that there is an unrepaired prior damage (Vorschaden) and thereby delays settlement. | https://dejure.org/2021,49049 |
| OLG Dresden | 18 U 313/21 | 17.06.2021 | Renting a replacement vehicle is an exercise of the claimant's Dispositionsfreiheit (freedom to decide how the damage is remedied) under § 249 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB. | https://dejure.org/2021,19897 |
| OLG Hamm | I-7 U 31/21 | 21.12.2021 | A complete exclusion of reduced liability cover (Haftungsreduzierung) in rental car terms and conditions for gross negligence is invalid; the benchmark is the proportionate reduction under § 81 Abs. 2 VVG. | https://dejure.org/2021,54820 |
| LG Baden-Baden | 3 S 24/20 | 14.01.2021 | The Schwacke list is confirmed as an estimation basis; an average of Schwacke and Fraunhofer ('Fracke') was expressly rejected. | https://dejure.org/2021,3922 |
| LG Karlsruhe | 10 O 243/19 | 30.05.2022 | Estimate based on the average of Schwacke and Fraunhofer ('Fracke'); the cost of a liability reduction (Haftungsreduzierung) is additionally reimbursable. | https://dejure.org/2022,16348 |
| LG Würzburg | 41 S 243/22 | 16.03.2022 | Estimate based on the Fraunhofer rental price index; the claim for the cost of a liability reduction exists independently of the claimant's own comprehensive cover. | https://dejure.org/2022,7760 |
| LG Wuppertal | 9 S 41/21 | 08.07.2021 | The local market rent is estimated using the average of Schwacke and Fraunhofer ('Fracke'); surcharges for comprehensive cover, satnav, winter tyres and an additional driver are confirmed. | https://dejure.org/2021,33183 |
| LG Stendal | 22 S 34/21 | 25.11.2021 | Rental car costs estimated with a 10 percent deduction for saved personal expenses. | https://dejure.org/2021,51522 |
| LG Wiesbaden | 3 S 133/20 | 22.04.2021 | Rental car costs estimated drawing on both the Schwacke list and the Fraunhofer rental price index. | https://dejure.org/2021,11808 |
| LG Berlin | 45 O 203/19 | 07.09.2021 | On crediting saved personal expenses and rental car ancillary costs such as an additional driver, and on the question of a duty to advance-finance (Vorfinanzierungspflicht) on the claimant's part. | https://dejure.org/2021,39629 |
| LG Zwickau | 6 S 18/20 | 22.01.2021 | Rental car costs are estimated under § 287 ZPO on the basis of the Schwacke list; winter tyres are reimbursable. | https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Zwickau&Datum=22.01.2021&Aktenzeichen=6+S+18%2F20 |
| AG Goslar | 28 C 61/23 | 25.10.2024 | A blanket reference by the insurer to cheaper rental options is not enough; it must name a concrete, actually accessible offer. | https://dejure.org/2024,41474 |
Frequently asked questions
Why won't my insurer pay my rental car bill in full?
Usually because it only recognizes the cheaper Normaltarif and sees no emergency, or because it applies an Eigenersparnisabzug (personal savings deduction) or points to its own rental car partner.
What is an Unfallersatztarif and why is it more expensive?
A price higher than the Normaltarif that rental companies charge to price in the risk of an accident rental — advance performance, uncertain payment by the other driver's insurer, and administrative effort.
Rental car or Nutzungsausfall — which is better for me?
Depends on your situation. If you need the vehicle daily and urgently, a rental car usually makes more sense. If you can do without mobility, the flat-rate Nutzungsausfallentschädigung (compensation for loss of use) pays more.
Do I have to get multiple quotes before renting?
Yes, if there is time. In a genuine Not- und Eilsituation (emergency situation) — for example, outside business hours — this requirement is waived as an exception.
Will I be reimbursed for a higher-class rental car if I actually need one?
Generally only up to the class of your damaged vehicle. For a higher class, you must justify a specific, accident-related need.
Does the insurer automatically deduct an amount for Eigenersparnis?
Not automatically, but often for a rental car of the same or higher class. The amount varies by court, ranging roughly between three and 15 percent.
Sources
- BGH, Urteil vom 19.05.2026, Az. VI ZR 67/25 (NJW 2026, 2411) — https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de
- BGH, Urteil vom 15.02.2005, Az. VI ZR 74/04 (NZV 2005, 301) — https://verkehrslexikon.de/
- BGH, Urteil vom 05.03.2013, Az. VI ZR 245/11 — https://www.openjur.de
- LG Hagen, Urteil vom 19.06.2020, Az. 1 S 18/20 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Hagen&Datum=19.06.2020&Aktenzeichen=1+S+18%2F20
- LG Leipzig, Urteil vom 23.01.2014, Az. 5 S 345/13 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Leipzig&Datum=23.01.2014&Aktenzeichen=5+S+345%2F13
- LG Berlin, Urteil vom 10.07.2014, Az. 41 S 160/13 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Berlin&Datum=10.07.2014&Aktenzeichen=41+S+160%2F13
- AG Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Urteil vom 03.09.2021, Az. 4 C 195/21 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Hohenstein-Ernstthal&Datum=03.09.2021&Aktenzeichen=4+C+195%2F21
- AG Bonn, Urteil vom 29.11.2012, Az. 111 C 152/12 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Bonn&Datum=29.11.2012&Aktenzeichen=111+C+152%2F12
- AG Wolfratshausen, Urteil vom 13.05.2026, Az. 5 C 348/25 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Wolfratshausen&Datum=13.05.2026&Aktenzeichen=5+C+348%2F25
- LG Nürnberg-Fürth, Urteil vom 23.05.2007, Az. 8 S 1002/07 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+N%C3%BCrnberg-F%C3%BCrth&Datum=23.05.2007&Aktenzeichen=8+S+1002%2F07
- AG Hof, Urteil vom 04.09.2006, Az. 14 C 1695/05 (NZV 2007, 149) — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=AG+Hof&Datum=04.09.2006&Aktenzeichen=14+C+1695%2F05
- BGH, Urteil vom 29.01.2019, Az. VI ZR 481/17 (NJW 2019, 1669) — https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de
- BGH, Urteil vom 31.01.2012, Az. VI ZR 143/11 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=31.01.2012&Aktenzeichen=VI+ZR+143%2F11
- BGH, Urteil vom 02.02.2010, Az. VI ZR 139/08 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=02.02.2010&Aktenzeichen=VI+ZR+139%2F08
- BGH, Urteil vom 02.02.2010, Az. VI ZR 7/09 — https://dejure.org/2010,51
- BGH, Urteil vom 14.02.2006, Az. VI ZR 126/05 — https://dejure.org/2006,77
- BGH, Urteil vom 12.10.2004, Az. VI ZR 151/03 — https://dejure.org/2004,22
- BGH, Urteil vom 25.03.2009, Az. XII ZR 117/07 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=25.03.2009&Aktenzeichen=XII+ZR+117%2F07
- OLG Celle, Urteil vom 13.09.2023, Az. 14 U 19/23 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=OLG+Celle&Datum=13.09.2023&Aktenzeichen=14+U+19%2F23
- OLG Naumburg, Urteil vom 08.11.2018, Az. 3 U 37/18 — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=OLG+Naumburg&Datum=08.11.2018&Aktenzeichen=3+U+37%2F18
- OLG Naumburg, Urteil vom 22.10.2021, Az. 7 U 28/21 — https://dejure.org/2021,49049
- OLG Dresden, Urteil vom 17.06.2021, Az. 18 U 313/21 — https://dejure.org/2021,19897
- OLG Hamm, Urteil vom 21.12.2021, Az. I-7 U 31/21 — https://dejure.org/2021,54820
- LG Baden-Baden, Urteil vom 14.01.2021, Az. 3 S 24/20 — https://dejure.org/2021,3922
- LG Karlsruhe, Urteil vom 30.05.2022, Az. 10 O 243/19 — https://dejure.org/2022,16348
- LG Würzburg, Urteil vom 16.03.2022, Az. 41 S 243/22 — https://dejure.org/2022,7760
- LG Wuppertal, Urteil vom 08.07.2021, Az. 9 S 41/21 — https://dejure.org/2021,33183
- LG Stendal, Urteil vom 25.11.2021, Az. 22 S 34/21 — https://dejure.org/2021,51522
- LG Wiesbaden, Urteil vom 22.04.2021, Az. 3 S 133/20 — https://dejure.org/2021,11808
- LG Berlin, Urteil vom 07.09.2021, Az. 45 O 203/19 — https://dejure.org/2021,39629
- LG Zwickau, Urteil vom 22.01.2021, Az. 6 S 18/20 — BVSK-Wissensdatenbank führt dies fälschlich als „OLG Zwickau“; ein OLG Zwickau existiert nicht — https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG+Zwickau&Datum=22.01.2021&Aktenzeichen=6+S+18%2F20
- AG Goslar, Urteil vom 25.10.2024, Az. 28 C 61/23 — https://dejure.org/2024,41474